The International Accord

The International Accord on Cognitive Liberty is a proposed global framework for protecting cognitive autonomy in an era of artificial intelligence, persuasive technology, and neural interfaces. Developed through consultation with legal scholars, neuroscientists, technologists, and civil society advocates, the Accord establishes binding principles and standards for governments, institutions, and technology developers committed to preserving the mind as a space of freedom.

It treats cognitive liberty as a core human right and sets out principles, rights, and regulatory standards to defend it. The Accord emerges from an urgent recognition: the technologies shaping our information environment are increasingly capable of influencing not just what we know, but how we think.

“A teenager whose feed is continuously steered toward anxiety-inducing and polarizing content because a recommendation system is tuned for engagement at any cost.”

“An older adult using a consumer neural device, unaware that their brain activity is being harvested and profiled for commercial gain.”

Foundational Principles

Article 1 sets out five foundational principles for cognitive sovereignty.

  1. Right to Cognitive Sovereignty

    Every person has the inherent right to maintain sovereignty over their own mental processes, thoughts, and consciousness. This right encompasses freedom from non-consensual cognitive interference, manipulation, or alteration by any state, corporation, or other actor.

  2. Informed Cognitive Engagement

    Individuals must be provided with clear, accessible, and comprehensive information about how technologies interact with their cognitive processes. Consent to cognitive engagement must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous.

  3. Protection from Manipulation

    Technologies shall not be designed or deployed with the intent to manipulate, deceive, or unduly influence cognitive processes in ways that undermine rational agency. This prohibition extends to addictive design patterns and exploitation of cognitive biases.

  4. Cognitive Diversity

    The right to cognitive diversity — including diverse forms of thought, belief, and consciousness — must be protected. Technologies must not be used to enforce cognitive uniformity, eliminate cognitive differences, or unduly narrow the spectrum of human thought and experience.

  5. Special Protections

    Children, persons with cognitive disabilities, and other vulnerable groups shall receive enhanced protection from cognitive manipulation and interference. Technologies that target these groups must be subject to heightened scrutiny and stricter standards.

Key Provisions — Articles 2–7

ARTICLE 2

Transparency Obligations

  • Algorithmic systems that influence cognition must disclose their operation, objectives, and methods in plain language.
  • Technology companies must publish regular cognitive impact assessments for their products and platforms.
  • Users have a right to access information about how recommendation and personalization systems shape their information environment.
  • Governments and regulatory bodies must maintain public registries of cognitive-influence technologies deployed in public-facing systems.
  • Research on cognitive effects of technologies must be disclosed and made available for independent review.

ARTICLE 3

Design Requirements

  • Technology products must be designed to enhance rather than diminish cognitive autonomy.
  • Addictive design patterns, dark patterns, and techniques that exploit cognitive biases for commercial gain are prohibited.
  • Users must be provided with meaningful controls over algorithmic curation and recommendation systems.
  • Default settings must prioritize user wellbeing and cognitive autonomy over engagement metrics.
  • Products must include clear opt-out mechanisms for any feature that influences cognitive processes.

ARTICLE 4

Neural Interface Governance

  • Neural interface technologies must be subject to rigorous pre-market safety and ethics review.
  • Data derived from neural interfaces is classified as sensitive cognitive data and entitled to the highest levels of protection.
  • Commercial exploitation of neural data for advertising, profiling, or manipulation is prohibited.
  • Individuals retain inalienable rights over their neural data, including rights to erasure and portability.
  • Research involving neural interfaces must comply with heightened informed consent requirements.

ARTICLE 5

Implementation and Enforcement

  • Ratifying nations shall establish independent Cognitive Liberty Commissions with investigative and enforcement powers.
  • Individuals harmed by violations of cognitive liberty shall have access to effective remedies and redress mechanisms.
  • Technology companies operating in ratifying jurisdictions shall be subject to regular cognitive impact audits.
  • Penalties for violations must be proportionate, dissuasive, and include both financial sanctions and operational restrictions.
  • Cross-border violations shall be addressed through cooperative enforcement mechanisms between ratifying nations.

ARTICLE 6

Research and Education

  • Ratifying nations shall invest in independent research on the cognitive effects of emerging technologies.
  • Public education programs on cognitive rights and digital literacy shall be integrated into national curricula.
  • Researchers studying cognitive liberty must be protected from undue interference by industry or government.
  • International collaboration on cognitive liberty research shall be actively facilitated and funded.
  • The findings of cognitive liberty research must be made publicly available in accessible formats.

ARTICLE 7

Review and Adaptation

  • The Accord shall be subject to comprehensive review every three years to account for technological developments.
  • A standing international committee shall monitor implementation and recommend updates to the Accord.
  • Civil society organizations shall be formally included in review and adaptation processes.
  • Emerging technologies presenting novel cognitive risks shall trigger expedited review procedures.
  • The Accord's principles shall be interpreted expansively to address unforeseen technological challenges.

Global Implementation Plan

The Accord is designed for practical adoption by diverse legal systems. Ratifying nations are encouraged to pass implementing legislation, create dedicated oversight bodies, and participate in multilateral forums that coordinate standards. We envision Cognitive Liberty Commissions, global summits, and open-source tools for algorithmic transparency that help governments and civil society monitor cognitive impacts.

Call to Governments and Multilateral Bodies

We call on governments, international organizations, and civil society to recognize cognitive liberty as a fundamental human right and to take concrete steps toward its legal protection. The moment to act is now — before the technologies of cognitive influence become so entrenched that governance becomes impossible. Join us in building a world where every person retains sovereign control over their own mind.

Get InvolvedView All Documents